Distinct interpretations about science in China

the views of Marcel Granet, Karine Chemla and Christoph Harbsmeier in perspective

Authors

  • Eduardo Vichi Antunes Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53727/rbhc.v13i1.20

Keywords:

Science in China, philosophy, sinology, prejudices

Abstract

Little is known about how science is problematized in China. If science does not constitute a foreign dimension to the way society’s thought manifests itself, turning one’s attention to philosophy is crucial to progress on the scientific matter. However, the West, as a general rule, ignores a great part of Chinese philosophical tradition or misinterprets it. Acknowledging this fact, this article seeks to analyze the contributions of three important intellectuals, Marcel Granet, Karine Chemla and Christoph Harbsmeier, so as to put them in dispute in the realm of sinology. By doing so, we intend to surpass western prejudices regarding the inexistence of a legitimate science in China.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Eduardo Vichi Antunes, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp)

Doutorando em Ciências Sociais pela Unicamp.

Published

2020-06-14

Issue

Section

Essays