La importancia de diferentes abordajes historiográficos para hacer historia de la ciencia

Michele Dias Medeiros

doi:10.53727/rbhc.v14i2.685

Autores/as

Michele Dias Medeiros Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53727/rbhc.v14i2.685

Palabras clave:

historiografía, marxismo, SSK, constructivismo, género, historia de la ciencia

Resumen

Este ensayo analiza las opciones historiográficas adoptadas por Evellen Richards en el libro Darwin and the making of sexual selection, haciendo un recorrido por las publicaciones de la autora a lo largo de su carrera para entender cómo ha construido su mirada historiográfica en esta obra. Con este análisis es posible entender muchos de los cambios que la historia de la ciencia ha pasado en cuanto disciplina desde finales de los años 1970 hasta el presente.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

BLOOR, D. Conocimiento e imaginario social. Barcelona: Gedisa, 1998.

CASTRO, E. Ideología. In: CASTRO, Edgardo (Org.). El vocabulario de Michel Foucault: un recorrido alfabético por los temas, conceptos y autores. Quilmes: Universidad Nacional de Quilmes, 2005. p. 279-280.

COLLINS, H. Captives and victims: comment on Scott, Richards and Martin. Science, Technology & Human Values, v. 16, n. 2, p. 249-251, 1991.

COLLINS, H. In praise of futile gestures: how scientific is the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge? Social Studies of Science, v. 26, n. 2, p. 229-244, 1996.

COLLINS, H.; EVANS, R. The third wave of Science Studies: studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science, v. 32, n. 2, p. 235-296, 2002.

FROSINI, F. Ideologia. In: LIGUORI, Guido; VOZA, Pasquale (ed). Dicionário Gramsciano 1926-1937. São Paulo: Boitempo Editorial, 2017. p. 785-790.

KELLER, E.F. Just what is so difficult about the concept of gender as a social category? Response to Richards and Schuster. Social Studies of Science, v. 19, n. 4, p. 721-724, 1989.

MARTIN, B.; RICHARDS, E.; SCOTT, P. Who’s a captive? Who’s a victim? Response to Collin’s method talk. Science, Technology & Human Values, v. 16, n. 2, p. 252-255, 1991.

PESTRE, D. Pour une histoire sociale et culturelle des sciences: nouvelles définitions, nouveaux objets, nouvelles pratiques. Histoire, Sciences Sociales, v.50, n.3, p.487-522, 1995.

PESTRE, D. Thirty years of Science Studies: knowledge, society and the political. History and Technology, v. 20, n. 4, p. 351-369, 2004.

PESTRE, D. Concluding remarks: debates in transnational and science studies: a defence and illustration of the virtues of intellectual tolerance. British Society for the History of Science, v. 45, n .3, p. 425-442, 2012.

RESTIVO, S. Introduction. In: RESTIVO, S. (Org.). Science, society, and values: toward a sociology of objectivity. Bethlehem: Lehigh University Press, 1994. p. 3-28.

RICHARDS, E. Darwin and the Descent of Woman. In: OLDROYD, D.; LANGHAM, I. (Eds.). The wider domain of evolutionary thought. Heidelberg: Spring Netherlands, 1983. p. 57-111.

RICHARDS, E. A political anatomy of monsters, hopeful and otherwise. Isis, v. 85, p. 377-411, 1994.

RICHARDS, E. (Un)Boxing the monster. Social Studies of Science, v. 26, n .2, p. 323-356, 1996.

RICHARDS, E. Redrawing the boundaries: Darwinian science and Victorian women intellectuals. In: LIGHTMAN, B. (ed.). Victorian Science in context. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1997. p. 119-142.

RICHARDS, E. Darwin and the making of sexual selection. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2017.

RICHARDS, E. Author’s response, Metascience, v. 27, p. 411-420, 2018.

RICHARDS, E. Introduction. In: RICHARDS, Evelleen. Ideology and evolution in nineteenth century britain: embryos, monsters, and racial and gendered others in the making of evolutionary theory and culture. London: Routledge, 2021. n.p.

RICHARDS, E.; ASHMORE, M. More sauce please! The politics of SSK: neutrality, commitment and beyond. Social Studies of Science, v. 26, n. 2, p. 219-228, 1996.

RICHARDS, E.; SCHUSTER, J. The feminine method as myth and accounting resource: a challenge to gender studies and social studies of science. Social Studies of Science, v. 19, n. 4, p. 697-720, 1989.

SCOTT, J.W. El género: una categoría útil para el análisis histórico. In: AMELANG, J.S.; NASH, M. (eds.). Historia y género: las mujeres en la Europa moderna y contemporánea. Valencia: Edicions Alfons el Magnànim, 1990. p. 23-56.

SCOTT, P.; RICHARDS, E.; MARTIN, B. Captives of controversy: the myth of the neutral social researcher in contemporary scientific controversies. Science, Technology & Human Values, v. 15, n. 4, p. 474-494, 1990.

SHAPIN, S. Here and everywhere: Sociology of Scientific Knowledge. Annual Review of Sociology, v. 21, p. 289-321, 1995.

SHAPIN, S. The Darwin Show. London Review of books, v. 32, n. 1, n.p., 2010.

YOUNG, R.M. Evolutionary biology and ideology: then and now. Science Studies, v. 1, n. 2, p. 177-206, 1971.

SHAPIN, S. The historiographic and ideological contexts of the nineteenth-century debate on man’s place in nature. In: YOUNG, Robert M. Darwin’s metaphor: nature’s place in Victorian culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985. p. 164-247.