The distinction between the contexts of discovery and justification as seen through the interaction of the unity of science and the integrity of the scientist

the William Whewell’s case

Authors

  • Leonardo Rogério Miguel Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)
  • Antonio Augusto Passos Videira Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53727/rbhc.v4i1.316

Keywords:

William Whewell, philosophy of science, history of science, ontexts of discovery and justification, science and religion, Victorian Age

Abstract

This study aims to analyse the distinction between the context of justification and the context of discovery based on some ideas developed by William Whewell (1794- 1866). By reading Whewell’s writings and intellectual biography ,we observe that his philosophy of science and its role in his own historical-philosophical and moral project for the reform of science require the inclusion of elements which had been regarded as secondary by philosophers of science during the twentieth century. We conclude that for Whewell the epistemological and methodological aspects of science are not independent of the integrity of the training as well as of the intellectual and moral commitments of scientists, nor of the historical understanding of knowledge production.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Leonardo Rogério Miguel, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)

Mestre em Filosofia e doutorando do Programa de Pós-graduação em Filosofia da UERJ.

Antonio Augusto Passos Videira, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)

Professor adjunto do Departamento de Filosofia da UERJ (IFCH/UERJ) e bolsista de produtividade do CNPq.

Published

2011-06-30

Issue

Section

Articles